Stephanie,
First and foremost, I'm very glad to know that you are no longer subject to abuse; and second, you are clearly a powerful force in the world, and a strong woman! My hat's off to you, and I wish you every good happiness.
I'm glad that MK is working for you, and, since you said you take a bus, I'm thinking that you probably live in a fairly urban community; if so, you may easily be able to subscribe to a local community currency network, which could really amplify the value of any earned income, as well expanding the variety and quality of goods and services to which you have access; LETTS systems (as well as more and more community currencies) are not limited to their geographic location, as they record/distribute by computer - you may already know all about this, so if I'm being redundant here, please forgive.
here is a link to some relevant links/resources : http://www.communitycurrency.org/resources.html#LCWS
Let me know if you'd like any other information, links, or urls.
again, all the best,
Bunny W - 18 Feb 2004
ps - as for the conflicts over the promised income potential in MK, my take on that is: I just think they (they, meaning, the company itself and, apparently, the majority of recruiters/directors)should probably just knock off all the hype, and be more realistic and honest in their presentation. People who have been really burned by their MK experience - and they may even have been financially successful themselves, but got tired of being advised to misrepresent things - are naturally going to wince and cringe a little (or a lot, lol) whenever they see/hear what they saw/heard over and over at their Leadership conferences ... one of the problems with the financial information that is presented by the company and its senior reps - the showing of commissions, bonuses, etc. - is that it's so goofily amateurish and woefully incomplete (and I don't mean to insult anyone here, and I'm not being critical of your posting of Ms Jordan's information): running a business means running expenses and capitalization costs; budgets for marketing and promotion; inventory losses through obsolescence; etc., etc.; and a real financial statement details all that, as well as income from all aspects of the business, and tax obligatons and benefits.
So there is, for some, frustration to the point of exasperation over the way the company presents, and trains its reps to present, the income potential to new consultants. I think the basic idea from the dissenters is: For pete's sake, just tell the truth; the truth obviously includes a wide variety of possible and demonstrated outcomes. What's so bad about that? Common sense and even a small amount of experience in the working world would tell you that's the reality, any way, wouldn't it? If you know this, you feel the company is both talking down to you (ick), and inflating the potential unnecessarily; if you don't know it, you may well be deceived and, ultimately, feel betrayed and ill-used.
How about the company developing comparative sample financial statements, showing: a primarily sales based consultancy; a 50-50; a primarily recruitment based business; a 60-40; whatever ... just get the information out there in an honest way.
Maybe MK is just experiencing growing pains, lol?
| Topic MaryKayOpinion139 . { Edit | Ref-By | Attach | Diffs | r1.3 | > | r1.2 | > | r1.1 } |
|
Revision r1.3 - 19 Feb 2004 - 11:42 by LauraRyan Privacy Policy |
Copyright © 2000-2005 by the contributing authors.
All material on this collaboration tool is the property of the contributing authors. Collect email addresses here. Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback. |