I got a $247 deduction from the Barbie (which I hope to sell in the future for a substantial profit) and a Fax/Phone/Copier.........really no big deal.
If you bought a couple of thousand, you should be able to recoup most of it. You DO GET tax returned on the retail value in addition to the 90% buyback......so you'd get whatever tax rate 6. 6.25, etc., on 4,000 if you bought 2,000. And, you won't have to report it on your taxes unless you bought $5,000 of product wholesale or got $600 in prize value/commissions from the company in a year.
Please write to me at user marclauraryan7 at domain yahoo.com regarding the repurchase program, I have some ideas you might want to consider.
LauraRyan
- 05 Feb 2004
Thanks for the info. For those who are considering returning their inventory, this makes it a more viable option. But for those who are planning on buying inventory, don't assume that they will do this... read the agreement, because that's going to spell out all they're obligated to do. If they do any more, it's a gift.
EliMantel
- 05 Feb 2004
Thanks for the heads-up, but, if I might ask, what do you mean in regard to not assuming that MK will handle every return as they are handling Laura's? Is the policy as written to be regarded as merely a "guide," one that is variously interpreted and applied on a case by case basis?
Or is there somewhere a guide to the guide - i.e., a written listing of causes for exception(s) and/or addition(s) to the written policy?
Just curious. Thanks.
Bunny Watson
- 05 Feb 2004
Do you know what the policy "as written" is? If so, please post it.
If a Mary Kay consultant chooses to exercise the inventory return option and is not satisfied with the deductions made, their only option may be to take Mary Kay to small claims court.
This would be a suit for breach of contract. Now which do you think the judge will consider to be the weightier evidence in deciding the case?
Enough said?
Eli Mantel
- 08 Feb 2004
Eli:
You have said before in a post that you are not affiliated with Mary Kay, so how you feel that you are qualified to even speak on the topic? Do you have a friend in Mary Kay or what? Its very obvious that you are just talking to have yourself heard of throw a spin on things. Maybe you should just post FACTS and not what you THINK the answer could be.
Eli:
I'd like to make it abundantly clear that the unsigned response above was not posted by me - on the contrary, I'd say that you are quite right: enough said indeed. Oh, and btw: no, I have neither personal knowledge nor a copy of the policy as written, and, in fact, don't know for certain that such a thing exists.
Bunny Watson - 10 Feb 2004
| Topic MaryKayOpinion91 . { Edit | Ref-By | Attach | Diffs | r1.7 | > | r1.6 | > | r1.5 | > | r1.4 | >... } |
|
Revision r1.7 - 10 Feb 2004 - 14:45 by BunnyWatson Privacy Policy |
Copyright © 2000-2005 by the contributing authors.
All material on this collaboration tool is the property of the contributing authors. Collect email addresses here. Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback. |